• moustachio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 小时前

      I think they know they’re not going to have infinite humans at their disposal they have now, sometime soon.

      They built their bunkers, now they need the subservient labor class they enjoyed… in the form of AI.

  • lobut
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 小时前

    Yeah, my company’s like that too. I’m like, why are we spending tokens when we know what the fix is and the AI isn’t listening?

    I think they believe that we’re gaining the skills to navigate the AI?

    I get it because it can accelerate a lot of development in certain ways, but like, we’re also losing the mental map of the codebase with this. I think it’d matter less for projects but for products … it’s weird to be like, “I never write code any more!” and be proud of it … although to be fair, I haven’t written much code after I became a lead.

    • cRazi_man@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 小时前

      It’s not sunk cost fallacy at all. They see this as well worth the investment. They’re making people put time into training their AI models. People are basically training the clueless intern who will take their job very soon. AI is done with training on all material that exists online. Now you have to force people to engage with it to give it more training.

      • moustachio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 小时前

        It’s not at risk of taking anyone’s job anytime soon. They have yet to even come close to LLMs being able to “know” what a right answer is. All they’re doing now is generating what their models predict you want to see. That’s why they produce slop that breaks down if you look closely.

  • zqwzzle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 小时前

    It’s their wet dream to be able to get rid of all their workers.

  • Shirasho@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 小时前

    It may be slower, but they think it is cheaper, thereby making it more profitable. These idiots only see short term profit and don’t care about the long term health of the company or the economy.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 小时前

    Terminator 2 warned us that the future was humanity enslaved to robots.

    What they didn’t tell us was how stupid the whole thing started.

  • VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 小时前

    AI is expensive, slow and ineffective, but by Bezos bald head we’ll use it!

    Bezos is right Amazon has to adopt AI or die trying.