• 0 Posts
  • 189 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2025

help-circle










  • My position is that the Schumacher Batman films are better than any Batman film that’s come out since, and it’s because of a fundamental ideological question:

    Nolan, Snyder, Reeves, all of these guys, have continually asked, “What would Batman look like in the real world?” And the answer has meant grittier, darker reboots all inspired by the same couple of Miller books. They need to constrain Batman to things that “make sense” and find ways to make him “seem realistic.”

    Schumacher, and Burton before him, asked the much more entertaining question: “What would the world need to look like to idolize a vigilante in a furry costume?” And that opens up so many more possibilities, so much more fun. The Riddler made elaborate pop-up clues rather than staging brutal crime scenes. Two-Face didn’t mourn his almost-relationship with an assistant DA because he was too busy macking on a different girl for each face. Bane? Doesn’t matter if I could understand him, because he doesn’t have any lines anyway. He’s still the evil lady’s main henchman, but now he’s actually monstrously big.

    The '90s approach says yes to every wild idea the directors had, every silly gag from the comics or other TV that it wanted to steal, because it wasn’t beholden to a sense of the real. It was okay to enjoy the silly superhero movie on its own terms.

    Unfortunately, we’re stuck in a world where each decade brings a grimmer, darker reboot of Batman.


  • Reminds me of a guy I used to work with. Any time he got frustrated with our manager, he’d mutter to himself, “Everyone gets one.”

    The way he explained it to me is, everyone is allowed to murder one person. You might suffer some real bad consequences as a result, but if you can stomach those consequences, no one can really stop you from doing just one murder.


  • tmyakal@infosec.pubto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 days ago

    The quick and dirty way to check your usage is to replace “who” with “he” and “whom” with “him.” If it makes a functional sentence, you’re probably right.

    “Whom is quicker?” becomes “Him is quicker.” Not good.

    “Who is quicker?” becomes “He is quicker.” That works.

    By contrast: “This graffiti was done by whom?” becomes “This graffiti was done by him.”