Does anyone like LLM summaries in pages? This seems like a better fit for a browser extension to generate a summary on demand instead of wasting resources generating it for everyone. Google’s documentation is absolutely littered with the mess.

What about https://swappa.com/? I haven’t used it myself but have been tempted.

We could have had Sanders… Arghh

I hate our idiots in charge - this is despicable.

Search is another key benefit. It’s really nice being able to search the gamut of open source repositories for bits of code.

I really think tools like voiden, hurl, and verb make sense. They make it easier to troubleshoot a system later or to share requests with other developers without leaving the repo. The only real challenge becomes handling authentication scenarios without putting secrets in plain text.

Speaking of writing a thesis, I imagine that leaves plenty of room for PTSD! I personally like the direnv support for emacs much more than other environments, and I’ve become a big fan of ripgrep and fuzzy finding.

Ha! I still love it though

I’ve been enjoying verb.

Californication Hell on Wheels Justified

I’m not mad about this, especially with Google pushing Gemini so hard on all their devices. I pulled up the Chromebook site to see their current offerings, and the prominent advertisement for Gemini is pretty disgusting after fresh news of another death.

I’m convinced it should be illegal to operate social media platforms for profit. It wouldn’t solve all the problems, but it would make a dent.

Fun puzzle - thanks for sharing!

In all fairness, this seems like an ideal problem for a model to solve.

Thanks for the info!

Why would anyone think this is a good thing? You’re actively telling the world that your product is likely full of bugs and hard to maintain.

You know, some of us might feel like 2009 wasn’t very long ago… 😳

Yep - I always disliked having to figure out food for the day before heading into the office. I’m not ready to eat breakfast until closer to noon, but once I start eating, I want to snack every hour or two while working.

This logic appeals to me but I’m curious how it could work legally as well as potential side effects. It seems likely that legal arguments would ensue over intended use of content, and it doesn’t seem like it should be illegal to use some created work in a new or unintended manner.

I think the overall goals are to encourage creative and academic work (which requires funding creators), discourage centralization of knowledge (prevent leverage over and manipulation of populace), encourage distrust of llm output without source references in output, and discourage overuse of generative AI. I’m sure there are more, but that’s what comes to mind.

Duuuval!

C