

Holy fuck is that hard to read.


Holy fuck is that hard to read.


Had to look this up to verify. Holy shit is this grim.


I dunno if you’re being facetious, but it’s their entire personalities and all they talk about… In my experience, in general. No offense to pilots who don’t do this. How people describe marathon runners and vegans.


These are great testimonies - I can’t wait to try Inscryption.


Frankenstein’s monster was male and specifically asked for a female bride, it’s an integral part of the story. If Frankenstein’s monster asked for a non-binary partner, that too would be an integral part of the story and I would have used non-binary instead of female.
The entire film is predicated on a female Frankenstein’s monster and from what I now understand, lots of feminist themes.
If this were a parody of a Disney Princess movie and it was predicated on a male lead, I’d have to use the same language but you wouldn’t flip out.
I understand what you’re trying to get at, but I don’t think this is a spot to make a stand on gender language norms and the word “female” being sexist. There are times when it is, but this isn’t that time.


deleted by creator


I provided more substance than any preview for this movie


Monster Train was fantastic and Monster Train 2 is even better. I love the challenge modes and the new hellspawn.


I played the second one and I couldn’t finish it because it was boring. Think really basic turn-based rpg like Dragonquest with some half-baked Pokemon elements thrown in. Full disclosure - I really don’t like Dragonquest. It was cool in the day, but now it just feels basic and archaic, which some people are into.


Which is why it’s called, “Bride!” And not “The Bride of Frankenstein’s Monster” or something. Great. Who cares? So what if in this version scientists succeed in “making Frankenstein a bride”? It just doesn’t seem like the start of a gripping story to me. I can’t imagine caring what they would do or how the characters would feel. Frankenstein has been over explored and feels stale.


Poor things came to mind for me. That was a unique and thought-provoking take that also had great actors in Dafoe and Stone but didn’t seem so try-hard cringe. And it just came out 2 years ago, which just makes this movie look even worse to me.


I didn’t even see that poster quote - Oof. It does seem like hubris from the folks involved.


Who is this movie for? You have incredible dramatic actors, but the tone and make-up looks campy and goofy. It doesn’t feel like a scary horror movie; it looks too silly to take seriously. The previews are mostly just close-ups of Bale and Buckley with black shit on their faces. I also can’t imagine what the plot would be, besides making a female Frankenstein’s monster, and due to the above I can’t be bothered to find out why.


Seems like the FCC hates Christianity.
I bounced so far off that game. The constant endless hordes of enemies just made it an annoying tower defense

There’s no reason for the sender to have been redacted as well, of course.


Visited here a few years ago. I felt that they really undersold the Moorish castle. It was my favorite spot in Sintra


Wow, the animation effect is fantastic.


Looks great. I love the slime/shine.
I like them. Even if it doesn’t hide a loading screen in a specific instance, as others have pointed out, it breaks up the pace. It’s never very long and usually it makes me focus on some art, animation or music that I hadn’t noticed or was taking for granted. It usually lasts a very small amount of time. I think our attention spans have just shrunk so much.