When I read that paragraph, I was gobsmacked. They “spent months analyzing feedback”? Seriously? They needed charts and graphs to figure out that people just want Windows to work?
Should they have not analyzed feedback? Out of everything you could complain about Microsoft, complaining about them taking their time to get it right this time wouldn’t be one of them. I mean, they aren’t going to get it right this time, but that seems like a different complaint.
deleted by creator
I don’t think they actually have. They’ve even implied the opposite at times. https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/25/sam-altman-warns-theres-no-legal-confidentiality-when-using-chatgpt-as-a-therapist/
“Well, someone needs to run Vichy Canada!”
-Pierre, probably.
My bad, it seemed like you were implying that the 38.7% of people who signed the Forever Canadian petition and the 30% who are (or at least were) for Alberta separatism were the exact same group.
You think the people who signed the Forever Canadian petition are all people who want to leave Canada?
deleted by creator
Pretty much, yeah.
To your first question, not really. The entire point of the notwithstanding clause is such that it cannot be challenged by the court. To your second question, yes.
Sure, but the Canadian government isn’t the one who put out the ad. The Ontario government did. Why does Carney have to apologize for something that Ford did?
The streaking was so bad on mine that I bit the bullet and just replaced the windshield.
The Chief Electoral Officer would then review the signatures and determine if the petition has been successful. Successful legislative and policy initiatives would then be referred to a committee of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta for consideration. If the committee does not support a legislative initiative, a public vote would be held.
So it sounds like this passing doesn’t necessarily lead to a referendum. Which, again, leads to the “heads I win tails you lose” scenario.
It’s more so that there are 10 Albertans, 3 want to leave, and they need signatures from 2 to add it to the ballot for a referendum.
https://angusreid.org/smith-shapiro-sovereignty/
There would certainly be enough people to get 177 thousand signatures within 4 months.
It can, but maybe not. Unless I’m reading it wrong, a referendum vote isn’t actually needed.
Though if I am reading it right, it seems like a “heads I win, tails you lose” sort of scenario.
If the “leave” petition passes, it seems like they could just state “Yep that’s what Alberta wants now, no vote needed.”
I doubt that a “stay” petition would get such a benefit of the doubt.
Thomas Lukaszuk certainly could be lying about the reasons why he submitted the petition. He was the Deputy Premier of the PCs after all, so, there’s that.
The question from the petition that the Alberta Prosperity Project is proposing is “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?” which is currently being held up in the courts, while the Forever Canadian’s currently ongoing petition is “Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?”
There is currently no ongoing petition where signing it indicates a desire for Alberta to leave Canada.
She’s closer to the Wildrose portion of the party in terms of the merger.
In the sense that she was the actual leader of the Wildrose party.
If you buy them off Steam you don’t actually own the game. You own a license to play the game, and that license is non-transferable and can be revoked. Doesn’t matter if it’s on your hard drive.