Indeed. So clearly you’re in the group that knows. Now the real question is… How big is each group?

I will look into those, thanks!

I’m mainly using it to fill a small niche gap in my existing pirate fleet.

Request for media <> Servarr Stack + Usenet Indexer <> Download Client + Usenet Provider <> Media Server

Right on brother, I’m already on Usenet, mainly looking for a private tracker as a next to last resort.

Speaking of which, if anyone has an invite to spare for a good private tracker, please DM me. Private tracker I used since highschool has finally lost the plot.

But we must also be cognizant of those who don’t. Like all the people who would refuse to vote for Gavin Newsome because he isn’t giving enough support to some edge case.

I don’t think it’s really possible to have a reasonable argument against a vendor agnostic open standard in most cases.

For example, the response to my comment struck me as an incredibly ableist statement.

But I’m betting the author would respond that it wasn’t his intention at all.

And my reply to that would be, so it’s my fault for not being psychic during my initial comment, AND my fault for not being psychic during the reply?

Hardly seems fair to me.

Ah, dang it! I didn’t know that lady was the arbiter of universal human experience!

Pack it up everyone. We’re having fun the wrong way! Someone make her CEO of Blizzard, stat!

Question, on the phone app theres a built in gif search, is there a way to pull that up when on desktop? Or would I have to go look for a link to a gif then hyperlink it?

Fascinating, I never heard about that, so my causality chain only accounts for starting at:

Repeal of Fairness Doctrine

Water Gate

Frost / Nixon

Reaganomics

Clinton

Glass Steagle

Clinton Impeachment

Bush

NCLB

Plenty of details in between, I definitely want to fill out the timeline with as much detail as possible.

Have you considered that he already is?

"Judge not lest ye be judged. " -Matthew 7:1-5

Faith and science are not opposites or enemies. They are each 1/2 the puzzle. As someone who clearly feels spiritual, you already have 1/2 the picture.

So if you want the other half, you have a choice to make.

A) Take Leap of Faith and accept the truth as per scientific consensus weighted accordingly by the quality of the data upon which that consensus is based

B) Do the necessary hard work to actually learn about the topics you claim to know about.

I hold as a self evident truth that if you truly know a lot about a subject, you should be able to explain it without crashing out or getting upset.

Edit: typical, identity under threat, must down vote because the alternative is thinking.

Truth be told I never tried Wizard, always went for sorcerer. I don’t like structured learning I like to wander the topic at my discretion.

But yeah, AuDHD Sever Combined Type E/S

(Engineering / Systemizing)

Basically it’s like matrix vision.

Figuratively speaking. I don’t literally see flying code.

It’s just that I see everything as things operating inside a governing system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system nested in another system …

So my mind zooms around to the level of granularity needed for a given topic.

If we talk about government, my mind zooms in to the nation level.

If we talk space I might be at the solar system level or the galactic scale. Etc.

Yes, but then you limit the SCOPE and BOUNDS to just the topic of the conversation at hand! And then suddenly… it becomes a much simpler discussion. Because of the concept of Ontology, if the discussion is at the societal level, the facts have to be society level facts. If the argument is at the individual level, you use single examples and explore the possibilities that branch from the one case. But more often than not I see a right wing person talking about his lived experience using very poor wording and insufficient formulation, arguing with a left wing person who is talking in systemic realities and predictable reasoning, arguing that the generalized system applies perfectly uniformly to all people as if they were a monolith.

If I remember my old math and physics, it would look like the cross product of two vectors as the two conversations they are actually having, and the resultant reality of no actual understanding or communication took place.

AxB = M (the vector result representing the misunderstanding that occurred.)

EDIT:

I had an LLM translate my weirdo brain native tongue into normal words. I’ll try and develop this skill now that I am aware of it.

Neuro divergent? 😋

You say this as if the fact the human mind is always interpolating data isn’t a known fact. That’s why some people pick up on sarcasm and some don’t. Some people ARE psychic to the extent that they can read cues that are invisible to people like me.

Yeah it was popular for a minute back like in 2013 I think, give or take 1-2 years.

I mean we burned witches in the dark ages right, so the behavior dates back at least as far as that.

♥️ That’s one of my favorite quotes of all time.