Contractors are installing a 17-mile stretch of cylindrical buoys in the river to prevent illegal crossings from Mexico. These are the first of 536 miles of buoys that the federal government plans to stretch from the Gulf of Mexico deep into South Texas. The Department of Homeland Security has waived environmental laws and issued more than $1 billion in contracts to private companies to install them in continuous chains. Each industrial-style buoy is more than 12 feet long and four to five feet in diameter.

Experts consulted by Inside Climate News said they knew of no comparable undertaking on a dynamic river anywhere in the world. They warned that the buoys could speed up flood water in a region that already struggles with flooding. The buoys could also accumulate sediment and create new landforms in the river, provoking treaty disputes with neighboring Mexico. The buoys are planned through Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, Zapata, Webb, Maverick and Val Verde counties.

  • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Also please note that 70% of people here illegally are due to visa overstaying from a tourist visa. They flew here.

  • Coyote@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “It is inevitable that portions of the buoy system will break free and portions of the [border] wall will fail,” he wrote.

    “Even very small changes can have very big consequences,” Tompkins told the Laredo committee.

    -—

    Shaking my head in advance.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    19 hours ago

    America spending money on useless shit instead of spending money on its poor yet again

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Fucking hell. Not discounting the deadly consequences to immigrants but gosh what fresh ecological hell will these exert on the already stressed ecosystem there.

    • Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is all in preparation to prevent people from leaving the hellscape the US will become.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Easy to get trapped or killed doing that sort of thing. They’re very big and it’s shallow water.

      Also, security officers and vigilantes on the far shore have a history of just shooting you.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Actually, Texas slapped barbed wire on the underside of these when they put them up. I feel like the feds might do the same.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Ok, but how are these things changing that? Whether they swim under or cross the river without these things, people with guns are factors already there. If it’s too shallow to swim under you can easily climb over. The diameter is 1.5m and they are floating. They are less than 0.5m below the surface max, so if it’s really that shallow even a young kid can just stand there and climb over. If it’s 0.5m clearance under it it’s less than a 5sec swim underneath.

  • panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Why is it even necessary? Border crossings are at a historic low. If necessary, just put up concertina wire. These can be easily removed when no longer needed.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Why is it even necessary?

      First off, it lines a few friendly contractors’ pockets to the tune of $3B.

      Second off, you get to parade around at the border in front of some big metal tubes to announce “Mission Accomplished!” for your constituents.